Blog Post: On the last day of the public comment period, Keystone XL opponents held a rally in front of the State Department to deliver more than 2 million comments submitted to the State Department to urge Secretary Kerry and President Obama to reject the dirty, dangerous pipeline.
Blog Post: Canada’s National Energy Board (NEB) today announced its approval of pipeline giant Enbridge’s plan to reverse its Canadian Line 9 pipeline to bring tar sands east to Montreal. In doing so, the Canadian government has opened the way for toxic tar sands to come to Vermont. This comes only two days after 13 towns on and near the pipeline’s route in Vermont, as well as from other corners of the state, passed resolutions at Town Meeting stating opposition to tar sands transport here.
Blog Post: The original plan of environmentalist groups in the U.S. was to deliver one million comments opposing Keystone XL to the State Department this morning. But the response from people all over North America speaking out against the Keystone XL pipeline and the Canadian tar sands has been so enormous, a coalition of youth-driven environmental groups will now be delivering upwards of two million signatures to the doorstep of the White House this morning.
Blog Post: Last month, scientists from Environment Canada released a study citing research that estimated the rate at which tailings water is likely seeping from one lake (and into groundwater systems hydraulically connected to the Athabasca River). That rate to be 6.5 million litres per day. Lead author Richard Frank said, “This is the strongest indication to date that process water is reaching the river system.”
Blog Post: Thank you to each and every one of the hundreds of people who joined together for a march on Washington yesterday to ask the President to “Dec-line the Pipe-line”. And a special thanks to the 398 young people who put themselves on the line and were arrested in the XLDissent action. This exercise in peaceful dissent is what American leadership looks like. The marchers were demanding a rejection of the proposed Keystone XL pipeline standing up to our addiction to fossil fuels that threatens our air, land, water, and communities.
Blog Post: Nebraska is usually dismissed as “flyover country” in our national dialogue. But like the story of David and Goliath, the fight against the Keystone XL pipeline has shown the world that people who love their land possess the five smooth stones to slay the giant.
Blog Post: When U.S. President Obama met with Prime Minister Harper earlier this week, he highlighted the importance of considering climate change in key energy decisions, like the Keystone XL pipeline. The President said that climate change “has to affect all of our decisions at this stage because the science is irrefutable,” but was polite enough not to highlight that Canadian energy decisions do their best to ignore climate change. We can see this in recent decision-making related to the tar/oil sands, pipelines and tankers, and coal ports, with many federal government decision-makers insisting that they do not have the legal authority to consider climate change.
Blog Post: Not everyone thinks that pipelines lead to new carbon pollution. Some argue that the oil sands will be developed no matter what, so building a new pipeline has no impact on the pace of oil sands development. We’re not convinced. Energy East would increase the capacity of the pipeline network that carries crude out of western Canada by one-third. Crucially, this pipeline would carry oil sands to tidewater, where companies can load their crude onto tankers and sell it wherever it fetches the best price. Opening up the oil sands to world markets would make the economics of building new projects more compelling, which will lead to new oil sands production and the carbon pollution that comes with it.