Tar Sands Solutions Network

Join Us On:

Enbridge Northern Gateway

If approved, Enbridge’s Northern Gateway pipeline would run west from the Alberta tar sands to the port of Kitimat, British Columbia. The pipeline would cross 800 critical salmon-bearing streams and terminate in the heart of the world-renowned Great Bear Rainforest, where hundreds of super tankers larger than the Exxon Valdez would transport heavy tar sands oil through the world's fourth most dangerous waterway.

As a result, Northern Gateway has sparked fierce and unprecedented opposition from citizens, First Nations and communities of all political stripes, because it poses such unacceptable risks to the environment and local economies of B.C.

Learn More

Overview:
New twin pipeline from Alberta to Kitimat, BC
Key Problems:
- Crosses over 800 salmon streams
- Ends in heart of Great Bear Rainforest
- 400 Super tankers through world's 4th most dangerous waterway
Current Status:
National Energy Board recommendation expected Dec 2013. Harper Government to make final decision

According to Enbridge’s own calculations, there is a 23 per cent chance of at least one major super tanker spill during the 50-year lifespan of the Northern Gateway Pipeline. And a recent study from Simon Fraser University using internationally accepted scenarios calculated the likihood of nearly 800 spills over 50 years. Major spills would be almost impossible to clean up, would put local and regional economies and water sources at risk, and threaten endangered salmon populations that depend on clean water to spawn.

Like the Keystone XL and other new pipelines, Northern Gateway is also the key part of the oil industry's plans to unlock the rapid expansion of the tar sands, locking us into a further 50+ years of fossil fuel dependence and leading directly to catastrophic climate change.

Opposition against Northern Gateway is unprecedented. More than 130 B.C. First Nations have formed an unbroken wall of opposition to Enbridge's pipeline plans, a stance that will make it difficult for the project to proceed given that most B.C. First Nations have constitutionally protected rights over resource projects that cross their unceded lands. More than 140 federal politicians and 36 provincial politicians oppose it, as do twenty local governments including Vancouver, Prince Rupert, Terrace, Smithers, and the districts of Fort St. James, Skeena-Queen Charlotte and Kitimat-Stikine, who have all passed formal resolutions opposing Northern Gateway. In 2010 and 2012, the Union of BC Municipalities itself also passed major resolutions in opposition to pipelines and oil tankers.

Thousands of B.C. and Canadian citizens have publicly opposed Northern Gateway in ways and numbers not seen in the environmental movement in decades. Hundreds of protests have taken place in almost every community in the province, and polling consistently shows that between 60 and 80 per cent of British Columbians of all political leanings oppose the project.

The Northern Gateway Pipeline has no business risking all that makes British Columbia such a special place. That’s why so many people are working to make sure it never gets built.

Enbridge Northern Gateway Updates & Resources

National Energy Board orders Enbridge to stop work on Manitoba pipeline

July 28th 2014

Press Clipping: The National Energy Board has ordered Enbridge Inc. to stop work along its Line 3 oil pipeline in Manitoba after an inspection earlier this month revealed numerous environmental and safety concerns. Enbridge announced plans earlier this year to replace the pipeline in its entirety — a $7.5 billion undertaking that would be the largest project in the company's history. The NEB says it won't allow work to resume until it's satisfied the problems have been fixed by Enbridge.

The West wants out

Feature

Will Horter | Toronto Star - July 28th 2014

Blog Post: Stephen Harper’s handling of B.C. mirrors the conditions that created the Reform movement two decades ago. As the next federal election draws closer, conditions below the surface should remind political observers of another seismic event a generation ago. The central question for British Columbians, as it was for Albertans in the 1980s and ’90s, is this: Who gets to decide what’s in our best interest — Ottawa or the people who live here?

Northern Gateway is a zombie project

Don McLean | Hamilton 350 - July 22nd 2014

Blog Post: There is good news for Canada's democracy and environment. It comes in the form of federal government approval of Enbridge's Northern Gateway pipeline, designed to carry tar sands bitumen 1,200 kilometres across wilderness areas of Alberta and British Columbia to Kitimat. So how is this good news? Because pretty much everyone now agrees the approval is hardly worth the paper it is written on.

Doctors speak out against Enbridge Nothern Gateway

Feature

Christine Hinzmann | Prince George Citizen - July 19th 2014

Press Clipping: A group of 18 Prince George doctors has come out against the proposed Northern Gateway pipelines with a full-page ad in the Prince George Citizen. "We're concerned about the very significant health risks involved, because we're physicians, you know?" said Dr. Marie Hay, a pediatrician and one of the doctors opposed to the development of the twin pipelines from northern Alberta to Kitimat.. "We're not just interested in the health of people who live at the moment but also predominantly of the children and of the future."

See you in court, Enbridge!

Feature

Jessica Clogg | West Coast Environmental Law - July 19th 2014

Blog Post: In a wave of legal filings on July 11 and July 14, 2014, eight First Nations from Haida Gwaii to Yinka Dene territory west of Prince George set in motion legal proceedings that, combined with 9 court cases filed earlier this year, have the potential to stop or significantly delay the Enbridge Northern Gateway pipelines and tankers project.

First Nations launch multiple court challenges to Northern Gateway

Feature

Mike Laanela | CBC News - July 16th 2014

Press Clipping: Several B.C. First Nations are launching at least nine court challenges to try to block Enbridge's Northern Gateway pipeline, leaders revealed at a news conference this morning in Vancouver. First Nations leaders said they will argue the proposed pipeline and its recent approval by the federal government is a constitutional violation of their aboriginal land rights in their respective territories, particularly in light of the Supreme Court of Canada victory last month by the Tsilhqot'in First Nation.

Opinion: Enbridge’s chronic condition

Nikki Skuce | ForestEthics - July 7th 2014

Blog Post: When the federal government quietly issued its one-page press release approving Enbridge’s Northern Gateway pipeline and tanker project, it did so agreeing to 209 conditions set out by the National Energy Board. It sounds like a lot. Looking at the history of the NEB, it has never imposed so many conditions on a single project.